Jurisprudence Brief:
The Court set aside a decision of the Appeal Division which had found that the applicant's marriage was one of convenience. The Court found the credibility findings unreasonable. The fact that the applicant married quickly was not a basis to doubt the genuineness of the marriage. Although the applicant had misrepresented the period of inadmissibility of two years from the date of refusal had expired by the time of the appeal and the tribunal erred in concluding she was still inadmissible on that ground.